ERT Case Summary: Mr Edward Young v Australia, Communication No. 941/2000
This is the ERt case summary of the UN Human Rights Committee decision of Mr Edward Young v Australia, Communication No. 941/2000, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 (2003).
This is the ERt case summary of the UN Human Rights Committee decision of Mr Edward Young v Australia, Communication No. 941/2000, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 (2003).
This is the ERT case summary of the UN Human Rights Committee decision of Manuel Wackenheim v France, Communication No 854/1999, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/75/D/854/1999 (2002).
This is the ERT case summary of the UN Human Rights Committee decision of Lannooij Neefs v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 425/1990, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/51/D/425/1990 (1994).
This is the ERT case summary of the UN Human Rights Committee decision of Dietmar Pauger v. Austria, Communication No. 716/1996, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/65/D/716/1996.
This is the ERT case summary of the UN Human Rights Committee decision of Cornelis Hoofdman v The Netherlands, Communication No. 602/1994, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/64/D/602/1994.
This is the ERT case summary of the UN Human Rights Committee decision of Communication No. 694/1996: Canada. 05/11/99. CCPR/C/67/D/694/1996. (Jurisprudence).
This is the ERT case summary of the UN Human Rights Committee decision of Cecilia Derksen v. Netherlands, Communication No. 976/2001, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/80/D/976/2001 (2004).
This is the ERT case summary of the UN Human Rights Committee decision of Carl Henrik Blom v. Sweden, Communication No. 191/1985, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 216 (1990).
This is the ERT case summary of the UN Human Rights Committee decision of Balaguer Santacana v. Spain, Communication No. 417/1990, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/51/D/417/1990 (1994).
This is the ERT case summary of the UN Human Rights Committee decision of Aapo Järvinen v Finland, Communication No. 295/1988, UN Doc. CCPR/C/39/D/295/1988 (1990).